https://www.schuellerlaw.com/cases-and-legal-trends daily 0.75 2025-03-21 https://www.schuellerlaw.com/cases-and-legal-trends/2025/3/21/direct-loans-are-made-by-the-us-department-of-education-congress-and-my-loan-contract monthly 0.5 2025-03-21 https://www.schuellerlaw.com/cases-and-legal-trends/2025/3/19/common-law-trademarks-pawn-shops-and-nil monthly 0.5 2025-03-19 https://www.schuellerlaw.com/cases-and-legal-trends/2024/2/23/is-the-ncaa-about-to-fall-into-immediate-disarray-given-todays-federal-court-order monthly 0.5 2024-02-23 https://www.schuellerlaw.com/cases-and-legal-trends/blog-post-title-one-hakf6 monthly 0.5 2024-02-23 https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5abc0e7e31d4dfd45980207d/d8460740-2db3-4abd-bec1-2667845883c3/PXL_20240221_225502693.PORTRAIT.ORIGINAL-EDIT.jpg Cases and Legal Trends - Developments in Employee Mobility: California vs. Delaware TL;DR - California continues to narrow the permissible uses of non-compete agreements and similar so-called “restraints on trade,” while Delaware has upheld contractual restraints negotiated between sophisticated parties such as post-departure forfeiture and claw back provisions. Businesses with operations or employees in California should review their obligations and choice of law options if they have entered into any such agreements. https://www.schuellerlaw.com/cases-and-legal-trends/2024/2/23/nilrights monthly 0.5 2024-02-23 https://www.schuellerlaw.com/cases-and-legal-trends/tag/NIL monthly 0.5 https://www.schuellerlaw.com/cases-and-legal-trends/tag/NCAA monthly 0.5 https://www.schuellerlaw.com/cases-and-legal-trends/tag/Student+Athletes monthly 0.5 https://www.schuellerlaw.com/home daily 1.0 2025-03-21 https://www.schuellerlaw.com/evaschueller daily 0.75 2024-09-27 https://images.squarespace-cdn.com/content/v1/5abc0e7e31d4dfd45980207d/f0550580-0cf1-4195-b4b4-3358a8170a07/PXL_20231120_211055684.jpg https://www.schuellerlaw.com/contact daily 0.75 2024-09-27